z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Safety of Germline Genome Editing for Genetically Related “Future” Children as Perceived by Parents
Author(s) -
Tetsuya Ishii,
Íñigo de Miguel Beriaín
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the crispr journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2573-1602
pISSN - 2573-1599
DOI - 10.1089/crispr.2019.0010
Subject(s) - germline , autonomy , offspring , genome editing , tragedy (event) , psychology , developmental psychology , genetics , biology , genome , political science , pregnancy , gene , psychiatry , law
The social acceptability of germline genome editing (GGE) depends on its perceived safety, as well as respect for reproductive autonomy. However, it is doubtful that prospective parents sufficiently understand the risks of GGE. In the future, the use of GGE in specific situations seems plausible, as it offers couples potential means to safeguard genetically related future children from a serious disease and overcome infertility due to a gene mutation. Should GGE fail, however, some couples may be obliged to abort affected fetuses, or give birth to adversely affected children, which would be a tragedy. Some children might develop diseases later in life due to overlooked off-target mutations. Compounding this, some parents are unlikely to inform their offspring about the details of conception, hampering necessary follow-up. Prospective parents, scientists and policy makers should carefully discuss the safety implications of GGE for genetically related future children.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom