z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Returning Results of Stored Biological Samples and Biobanks: Perspectives of Saudi Arabian Biomedical Researchers
Author(s) -
Ghiath Alahmad,
Haneen Alzahrany,
Adel F. Almutairi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
biopreservation and biobanking
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.545
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1947-5535
pISSN - 1947-5543
DOI - 10.1089/bio.2020.0002
Subject(s) - biobank , informed consent , documentation , medical education , qualitative research , modalities , psychology , duty , research ethics , medicine , alternative medicine , family medicine , pathology , political science , bioinformatics , computer science , social science , psychiatry , sociology , law , biology , programming language
Scientific medical research involving human samples often leads to improved diagnosis, the discovery of treatment modalities, or the identification of possible risk factors for many diseases. Some findings, including incidental findings, may be important to donors, and some may require intervention. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of health care professionals in their use of stored biological samples for biomedical research regarding the concept of the research results and the challenges of informing donors regarding the results. This qualitative study involved 19 medical researchers doing research with stored biological samples and biobanks. The data were gathered during face-to-face interviews in English using a semistructured interview technique. The participants provided rich and illuminating experiences, framed in the following themes: the professional duty of researchers to return the research results and the right of donors to know; factors affecting informing donors of results (e.g., severity of disease; impact of the provided information; reliability of the research results; and donor approval); challenges to physically returning the results; and the nature of the informed consent, as well as the elements required in the informed consent documentation. Although the majority of researchers agree on the importance of returning research results, some have contradictory views such as that returning research results is not the researcher's responsibility. The study results also support the view that a number of elements should be included in the informed consent, such as the intention of informing the donors of the results as well as the benefits and risks.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom