Reporting of Protocol Rationale and Content Validity in Randomized Clinical Trials of T'ai Chi: A Systematic Evaluation | Zendy

Daniel Litrownik | Zendy; Elizabeth A. Gilliam | Zendy; Danielle Berkowitz | Zendy; Gloria Y. Yeh | Zendy; Peter M. Wayne | Zendy

Open Access

Reporting of Protocol Rationale and Content Validity in Randomized Clinical Trials of T'ai Chi: A Systematic Evaluation

Author(s) -

Daniel Litrownik,

Elizabeth A. Gilliam,

Danielle Berkowitz,

Gloria Y. Yeh,

Peter M. Wayne

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

the journal of alternative and complementary medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.55

H-Index - 90

eISSN - 1557-7708

pISSN - 1075-5535

DOI - 10.1089/acm.2018.0389

Subject(s) - medicine , protocol (science) , randomized controlled trial , grading (engineering) , medline , content validity , cochrane library , external validity , psychological intervention , consolidated standards of reporting trials , systematic review , clinical trial , alternative medicine , medical physics , clinical psychology , psychometrics , pathology , psychiatry , psychology , social psychology , civil engineering , political science , law , engineering

Mind-body exercise interventions are typically multimodal, complex, and pluralistic, and few have been developed with the goal of therapeutically targeting a specific medical population. It is thus important that clinical trials evaluating mind-body interventions provide some justification for the use of the specific protocol being evaluated.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research