Reliability of Ayurvedic Diagnosis for Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Nested Diagnostic Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial
Author(s) -
Christian S. Keßler,
Antonio Morandi,
Abhimanyu Kumar,
Kartar Singh Dhiman,
Shivenarain Gupta,
Katja Icke,
Carina Bühner,
Elmar Stapelfeldt,
Manfred Wischnewsky,
Ludwig Kronpaß,
Vijayendra Murthy,
Andreas Michalsen,
Claudia M. Witt
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the journal of alternative and complementary medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.55
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1557-7708
pISSN - 1075-5535
DOI - 10.1089/acm.2018.0273
Subject(s) - medicine , medical diagnosis , kappa , randomized controlled trial , physical therapy , cohen's kappa , osteoarthritis , reliability (semiconductor) , alternative medicine , surgery , radiology , pathology , philosophy , linguistics , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , machine learning , computer science
Background: Ayurveda is a traditional Indian system of medicine. The customized Ayurvedic approach consists of a combination of several diagnostic procedures and subsequent individualized therapeutic interventions. Evaluation of inter-rater reliability (IRR) of Ayurvedic diagnoses has rarely been performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate IRR of Ayurvedic diagnosis for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: A diagnostic reliability study of 30 patients and 4 Ayurvedic experts was nested in a randomized controlled trial. Patients were diagnosed in a sequential order by all experts utilizing a semistructured patient history form. A nominal group technique as consensus procedure was performed to reach agreement on the items to be diagnosed. An IRR analysis using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa statistics was performed to determine a chance-corrected measure of agreement among raters. Results: One hundred and twenty different ratings and 30 consensus ratings were performed and analyzed. While high percentages of agreement for main diagnostic entities and the final Ayurveda diagnosis (95% consensus agreement on main diagnosis) could be observed, this was not reflected in the corresponding kappa values, which largely yielded fair-to-poor inter-rater agreement kappas for central diagnostic aspects such as prakriti and agni ( κ values between 0 and 0.4). Notably, agreement on disease-related entities was better than that on constitutional entities. Conclusions: This is the first diagnostic study embedded in a clinical trial on patients with knee osteoarthritis utilizing a multimodality whole systems approach. Results showed a contrast between the high agreement of the consented final diagnosis and disagreement on certain diagnostic details. Future diagnostic studies should have larger sample sizes and a methodology more tailored to the specificities of traditional whole systems of medicine. Equal emphasis will need to be placed on all core diagnostic components of Ayurveda, both constitutional and disease specific, using detailed structured history taking forms.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom