z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Extraction and physicochemical characterization of chitin and chitosan isolated from house cricket
Author(s) -
E. B. Ibitoye,
I. H. Lokman,
Mohd Hezmee Mohd Noor,
Yong Meng Goh,
A.B.Z. Zuki,
Akeem Adebayo Jimoh
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
biomedical materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.744
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1748-605X
pISSN - 1748-6041
DOI - 10.1088/1748-605x/aa9dde
Subject(s) - chitin , chitosan , shrimp , cellulose , polysaccharide , fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , nuclear chemistry , food science , chemistry , materials science , biology , chemical engineering , fishery , organic chemistry , engineering
Chitin ranks next to cellulose as the most important bio-polysaccharide which is majorly extracted from crustaceous shell. However, emergence of new areas of application of chitin and its derivatives have been on the increase and there is a growing demand for new chitin sources. In this study therefore, attempt was made to extract chitin from house cricket (Brachytrupes portentosus) by chemical method. The physicochemical properties of chitin and chitosan extracted from crickets were compared with the commercial chitin and chitosan extracted from shrimp, in term of proximate analysis, particularly, of their ash and moisture contents. Also, infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and elemental analysis were conducted. Chitin and chitosan yield of house cricket ranges over 4.3 - 7.1% and 2.4 - 5.8% respectively. Chitin and chitosan from crickets compared favourably with those extracted from shrimps, and were found to exhibit some similarities. The result showed that cricket and shrimp chitins and chitosans have the same DA and DD of 108.1% and 80.5% respectively, following FT-IR. The characteristic XRD strong/sharp peaks of 9.4 and 19.4° for α-chitin are common for both cricket and shrimp chitins. The percentage ash content of chitin and chitosan extracted from B. portentosus is 1%, lower than those obtained from shrimp products. Therefore cricket chitin and chitosan can be said to be of better quality and of purer form than commercially produced chitin and chitosan from shrimp. Base on quality of the product, chitin and chitosan isolated from B. portentosus can replace commercial chitin and chitosan in the place of utilization and applications. Therefore, B. portentosus is thus a promising alternative source of chitin and chitosan.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom