z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Peer review declaration
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/011002
Subject(s) - clarity , publishing , presentation (obstetrics) , declaration , originality , library science , peer review , excellence , medical education , computer science , medicine , political science , law , biochemistry , chemistry , creativity , radiology
All papers published in this volume of IOP Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? : the organizing committee received submitted manuscript and distributed the manuscript to reviewers. Submitted manuscript was assigned to reviewers (minimum one reviewer for each of paper). The papers were reviewed based on the Clarity, Originality, Appropriateness of Material and method, Clarity of Findings. If reviewers accepted the papers or accepted with revision then the committee sent the manuscript back to authors, and the authors could address all comments from the reviewers. The authors sent the final manuscripts back to the committee. Finally, the editors finalized the final manuscripts by proofreading and checking the format of manuscripts based on IOP Publishing guidelines. • Conference submission management system: easy chair and email • Number of submissions received: 280 manuscripts • Number of submissions sent for review: 262 manuscripts • Number of submissions accepted: 212 manuscripts • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 212/206 x 100 = 80.91% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers. • Total number of reviewers involved: 70 reviewers. • Any additional info on review process: The papers were evaluated based on the technical criteria, quality criteria and presentation criteria. The referees contended detailed their reviews and provided an overall evaluation (accepted, accepted with revision, or rejected). • Contact person for queries (please include: name, affiliation, institutional email address) : Committee Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia committee.icmstea@unm.ac.id

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here