A Censored Maximum Likelihood Approach to Quantifying Manipulation in China’s Air Pollution Data
Author(s) -
Dalia Ghanem,
Shu Shen,
Junjie Zhang
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the association of environmental and resource economists
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.367
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 2333-5963
pISSN - 2333-5955
DOI - 10.1086/709649
Subject(s) - sky , beijing , china , econometrics , cutoff , statistics , elite , resource (disambiguation) , environmental science , economics , geography , mathematics , meteorology , computer science , political science , archaeology , computer network , physics , quantum mechanics , politics , law
Data manipulation around cutoff points is observed in economics broadly and in environmental and resource economics in particular. This paper develops a simple and tractable censored maximum likelihood approach to quantify the degree of manipulation in China’s air pollution data around the “blue-sky day” cutoff. We construct annual measures of manipulation for 111 Chinese cities. For Beijing, we estimate 4%–16.8% of manipulation among reported blue-sky days annually, which translate to an estimated total of 208.1 manipulated blue-sky days between 2001 and 2010. For the remaining cities reporting pollution data over the 10-year period, we estimate a 93.9 average for the total number of manipulated blue-sky days with a 395.9 maximum. Using LASSO shrinkage, we examine the relationship between manipulation and local official characteristics, and find a positive correlation between manipulation and having an elite-educated party secretary, robust to numerous checks. Further empirical analysis suggests that promotion considerations may help explain this finding.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom