z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Limits of Partisan Prejudice
Author(s) -
Yphtach Lelkes,
Sean Westwood
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the journal of politics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.489
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1468-2508
pISSN - 0022-3816
DOI - 10.1086/688223
Subject(s) - opposition (politics) , harm , prejudice (legal term) , typology , social psychology , politics , political science , polarization (electrochemistry) , rhetoric , psychology , sociology , law , philosophy , linguistics , chemistry , anthropology
Partisanship increasingly factors into the behavior of Americans in both political and nonpolitical situations, yet the bounds of partisan prejudice are largely unknown. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the limits of partisan prejudice using a series of five studies situated within a typology of prejudice. We find that partisan prejudice predicts suppression of hostile rhetoric toward one’s own party, avoidance of members of the opposition, and a desire for preferential treatment for one’s own party. While these behaviors may cause incidental or indirect harm to the opposition, we find that even the most affectively polarized—those with the strongest disdain for the opposition—are no more likely to intentionally harm the opposition than those with minimal levels of affective polarization.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom