Urbanization, State Formation, and Cooperation: A Reappraisal
Author(s) -
Justin Jennings,
Timothy Earle
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
current anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.294
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1537-5382
pISSN - 0011-3204
DOI - 10.1086/687510
Subject(s) - urbanization , state (computer science) , limiting , state formation , geography , enlightenment , argument (complex analysis) , assertion , economic geography , development economics , political economy , political science , sociology , economic growth , law , economics , biology , engineering , algorithm , computer science , mechanical engineering , philosophy , biochemistry , theology , politics , programming language
Since at least the Enlightenment, scholars have linked urbanization to state formation in the evolution of complex societies. We challenge this assertion, suggesting that the cooperative units that came together in the earliest cities were premised on limiting outside domination and thus usually acted to impede efforts to create more centralized structures of control. Although cities often became the capitals of states, state formation was quicker and more effective where environments kept people more dispersed. Data from the Andes and Polynesia are used to support this argument. In the Lake Titicaca Basin, household- and lineage-based groups living in the city of Tiahuanaco structured urban dynamics without the state for the settlement’s first 300 years, while similarly organized Hawaiian groups that were isolated in farmsteads were quickly realigned into a state structure. By decoupling urbanization from state formation, we can better understand the interactions that created the world’s first cities.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom