z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fair Is Good, but What Is Fair? Negotiations of Distributive Justice in an Emerging Nonmonetary Sharing Model
Author(s) -
Johanna Gollnhofer,
Katharina Hellwig,
Felicitas Morhart
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the association for consumer research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2378-1823
pISSN - 2378-1815
DOI - 10.1086/685706
Subject(s) - reciprocity (cultural anthropology) , negotiation , redistribution (election) , distributive justice , distributive property , context (archaeology) , perception , economic justice , economics , microeconomics , business , sociology , law and economics , political science , psychology , law , paleontology , social science , mathematics , neuroscience , politics , anthropology , pure mathematics , biology
By means of an ethnographic approach, this research examines perceptions of fairness and consumer behavior in an emerging nonmonetary sharing system. In contrast to market exchanges, which are defined by clear rules and principles of reciprocity, the redistribution of goods in a “sharing” context is in many cases less institutionalized and thus open to contestation. We draw on concepts from institutional theory to map out the interplay of different and partly contradicting fairness perceptions in an emerging nonmonetary sharing system and explain how those are negotiated and synthesized. We explicitly highlight a nonrelational fairness principle, leading to the stabilization of the sharing system under study through processes of “goal sharing” and “hierarchical coupling.” We discuss our findings in terms of their implications on sharing theory and the role of fairness within this literature stream.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom