z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Riociguat Given as an Oral Suspension or Crushed Tablet with and without Food
Author(s) -
Saleh Soundos,
Frey Reiner,
Becker Corina,
Unger Sigrun,
Wensing Georg,
Mück Wolfgang
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pulmonary circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.791
H-Index - 40
ISSN - 2045-8940
DOI - 10.1086/685020
Subject(s) - riociguat , bioequivalence , medicine , bioavailability , pharmacokinetics , crossover study , pharmacology , area under the curve , chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension , anesthesia , hemodynamics , placebo , alternative medicine , pathology
Riociguat is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Some patients have difficulty swallowing tablets; therefore, 2 randomized, nonblinded, crossover studies compared the relative bioavailability of riociguat oral suspensions and immediate‐release (IR) tablet and of crushed‐tablet preparations versus whole IR tablet. In study 1, 30 healthy subjects received 5 single riociguat doses: 0.3 and 2.4 mg (0.15 mg/mL suspensions), 0.15 mg (0.03 mg/mL), and 1.0 mg (whole IR tablet) under fasted conditions and 2.4 mg (0.15 mg/mL) after a high‐fat, high‐calorie American‐style breakfast. In study 2, 25 healthy men received 4 single 2.5‐mg doses: whole IR tablet and crushed IR tablet suspended in applesauce and water, respectively, under fasted conditions, and whole IR tablet after a continental breakfast. In study 1, dose‐normalized pharmacokinetics of riociguat oral suspensions and 1.0‐mg whole IR tablet were similar in fasted conditions; 90% confidence intervals for riociguat area under the curve (AUC) to dose and mean maximum concentration ( C max ) to dose were within bioequivalence criteria. After food, dose‐normalized AUC and C max decreased by 15% and 38%, respectively. In study 2, riociguat exposure was similar for all preparations; AUC ratios for crushed‐IR‐tablet preparations to whole IR tablet were within bioequivalence criteria. The C max increased by 17% for crushed IR tablet in water versus whole IR tablet. Food intake decreased C max of the whole tablet by 16%, with unaltered AUC versus fasted conditions. Riociguat bioavailability was similar between the oral suspensions and the whole IR tablet; exposure was similar between whole IR tablet and crushed‐IR‐tablet preparations. Minor food effects were observed. Results suggest that riociguat formulations are interchangeable.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here