
Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Riociguat Given as an Oral Suspension or Crushed Tablet with and without Food
Author(s) -
Saleh Soundos,
Frey Reiner,
Becker Corina,
Unger Sigrun,
Wensing Georg,
Mück Wolfgang
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pulmonary circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.791
H-Index - 40
ISSN - 2045-8940
DOI - 10.1086/685020
Subject(s) - riociguat , bioequivalence , medicine , bioavailability , pharmacokinetics , crossover study , pharmacology , area under the curve , chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension , anesthesia , hemodynamics , placebo , alternative medicine , pathology
Riociguat is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Some patients have difficulty swallowing tablets; therefore, 2 randomized, nonblinded, crossover studies compared the relative bioavailability of riociguat oral suspensions and immediate‐release (IR) tablet and of crushed‐tablet preparations versus whole IR tablet. In study 1, 30 healthy subjects received 5 single riociguat doses: 0.3 and 2.4 mg (0.15 mg/mL suspensions), 0.15 mg (0.03 mg/mL), and 1.0 mg (whole IR tablet) under fasted conditions and 2.4 mg (0.15 mg/mL) after a high‐fat, high‐calorie American‐style breakfast. In study 2, 25 healthy men received 4 single 2.5‐mg doses: whole IR tablet and crushed IR tablet suspended in applesauce and water, respectively, under fasted conditions, and whole IR tablet after a continental breakfast. In study 1, dose‐normalized pharmacokinetics of riociguat oral suspensions and 1.0‐mg whole IR tablet were similar in fasted conditions; 90% confidence intervals for riociguat area under the curve (AUC) to dose and mean maximum concentration ( C max ) to dose were within bioequivalence criteria. After food, dose‐normalized AUC and C max decreased by 15% and 38%, respectively. In study 2, riociguat exposure was similar for all preparations; AUC ratios for crushed‐IR‐tablet preparations to whole IR tablet were within bioequivalence criteria. The C max increased by 17% for crushed IR tablet in water versus whole IR tablet. Food intake decreased C max of the whole tablet by 16%, with unaltered AUC versus fasted conditions. Riociguat bioavailability was similar between the oral suspensions and the whole IR tablet; exposure was similar between whole IR tablet and crushed‐IR‐tablet preparations. Minor food effects were observed. Results suggest that riociguat formulations are interchangeable.