The Case of the Missing Indigene: Debate Over a “Second-Generation” Ethnic Policy
Author(s) -
Michael Elliott
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the china journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.033
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1835-8535
pISSN - 1324-9347
DOI - 10.1086/679274
Subject(s) - ethnic group , china , indigenous , political science , newspaper , politics , perspective (graphical) , happening , subject (documents) , immigration , public policy , sociology , political economy , gender studies , law , history , ecology , artificial intelligence , performance art , library science , computer science , biology , art history
The last few years have seen a vigorous public policy debate emerge over a “second-generation” ethnic policy (di’erdai minzu zhengce) which, if implemented, would constitute a major revision of ethnic politics in China. Despite the fact that nationalities policy is a notoriously sensitive subject within China, the debate is happening openly in newspapers, academic journals and on the Internet. The prominence accorded to anthropological theory and international comparison is a notable feature of the debate. This article first explores the main positions in the ongoing policy discussion, then goes on to argue that, rather than comparing China’s non-Han peoples to minority immigrant populations in the industrialized democracies, a better comparison is to indigenous peoples. It then considers why this perspective is completely missing from the present debate.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom