z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Lenient Death Sentencing and the “Cash for Clemency” Debate
Author(s) -
Susan Trevaskes
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the china journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.033
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1835-8535
pISSN - 1324-9347
DOI - 10.1086/679268
Subject(s) - cash , state (computer science) , sentence , law , homicide , life imprisonment , supreme court , compensation (psychology) , political science , criminology , sociology , business , psychology , poison control , suicide prevention , finance , social psychology , prison , medicine , environmental health , algorithm , computer science , linguistics , philosophy
This article examines how financial compensation has been drawn into death sentencing practice and debate in China. The Supreme People’s Court is nowadays encouraging judges to mediate between defendants and the families of homicide victims to secure a financial agreement between the two parties that will allow courts to sentence defendants to a two-year “suspended” death sentence which is commuted to a life sentence after the probation period. The SPC has promoted a series of “standard cases” that exemplify this practice. The controversial practice, dubbed “cash for clemency”, complicates the death penalty debate: critics say that it undermines the law and encourages “bargaining” for a life on the part of those who can afford to do so. Others, however, are sympathetic to any practice that can reduce execution rates. This controversy is part of a larger debate on state killing in the world’s largest killing state.Full Tex

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom