Engaging the Religiously Committed Other: Anthropologists and Theologians in Dialogue
Author(s) -
Eloise Meneses,
Lindy Backues,
David Bronkema,
Eric G. Flett,
Benjamin L. Hartley
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
current anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.294
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1537-5382
pISSN - 0011-3204
DOI - 10.1086/674716
Subject(s) - witness , sociology , secularism , flourishing , value (mathematics) , epistemology , scholarship , task (project management) , field (mathematics) , anthropology , philosophy , theology , social psychology , psychology , law , political science , linguistics , management , mathematics , machine learning , computer science , islam , pure mathematics , economics
Anthropology has two tasks: the scientific task of studying human beings and the instrumental task of promoting human flourishing. To date, the scientific task has been constrained by secularism, and the instrumental task by the philosophy and values of liberalism. These constraints have caused religiously based scholarship to be excluded from anthropology’s discourse, to the detriment of both tasks. The call for papers for the 2009 meetings of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) recognized the need to “push the field’s epistemological and presentational conventions” in order to reach anthropology’s various publics. Religious thought has much to say about the human condition. It can expand the discourse in ways that provide explanatory value as well as moral purpose and hope. We propose an epistemology of witness for dialogue between anthropologists and theologians, and we demonstrate the value added with an example: the problem of violence.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom