z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Rape and Attrition in the Legal Process: A Comparative Analysis of Five Countries
Author(s) -
Kathleen Daly,
Brigitte Bouhours
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
crime and justice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2153-0416
pISSN - 0192-3234
DOI - 10.1086/653101
Subject(s) - conviction , suspect , credibility , attrition , witness , criminology , law , sexual assault , political science , psychology , suicide prevention , poison control , medicine , medical emergency , dentistry
Despite legal reforms, there has been little improvement in police, prosecutor, and court handling of rape and sexual assault. In the past 15 years in Australia, Canada, England and Wales, Scotland, and the United States, victimization surveys show that 14 percent of sexual violence victims report the offense to the police. Of these, 30 percent proceed to prosecution, 20 percent are adjudicated in court, 12.5 percent are convicted of any sexual offense, and 6.5 percent are convicted of the original offense charged. In the past 35 years, average conviction rates have declined from 18 percent to 12.5 percent, although they have not fallen in all countries. Significant country differences are evident in how cases are handled and where in the legal process attrition is most likely. There is some good news: a victim's "good" character and credibility and stranger relations are less important than they once were in police or court outcomes. However, evidence of nonconsent (witness evidence, physical injuries to the victim, suspect's use of a weapon) continues to be important.Arts, Education & Law Group, School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeFull Tex

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom