English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Identification of reliable, reproducible, and precise end points for future studies of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia is of paramount importance for approval of new therapeutic agents. As required by the Code of Federal Regulations 21 CFR 314.126, the methods of assessment of a subject's response (ie, end points) must be well defined and reliable. The study protocol and results should explain the variables measured, the methods of observation, and criteria used to assess response. Meeting these requirements has proven to be problematic in clinical trials for the evaluation of new products for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia because of the subjectivity of assessing a clinical response end point. There are multiple issues and caveats to consider when selecting appropriate end points for these trials.

End Points in Hospital‐Acquired Pneumonia and/or Ventilator‐Associated Pneumonia Clinical Trials: Food and Drug Administration Perspective