Cost‐Effectiveness of Tenofovir as First‐Line Antiretroviral Therapy in India
Author(s) -
Melissa A. Bender,
Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy,
Kenneth H. Mayer,
Bingxia Wang,
Rochelle P. Walensky,
Timothy Flanigan,
Bruce R. Schackman,
Callie A. Scott,
Zhigang Lu,
Kenneth A. Freedberg
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1086/649884
Subject(s) - stavudine , zidovudine , lamivudine , medicine , tenofovir , reverse transcriptase inhibitor , nevirapine , abacavir , kharif crop , antiretroviral therapy , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , virology , viral load , viral disease , statistics , mathematics , virus , hepatitis b virus , field experiment
World Health Organization guidelines for antiretroviral treatment (ART) in resource-limited settings recommend either stavudine or tenofovir as part of initial therapy. We evaluated the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of first-line ART using tenofovir in India, compared with current practice using stavudine or zidovudine.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom