z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Transfusion Safety in the 21st Century: How Tightly Should the Blood Community Close the Window(s)?
Author(s) -
Louis M. Katz
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
the journal of infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.69
H-Index - 252
eISSN - 1537-6613
pISSN - 0022-1899
DOI - 10.1086/592278
Subject(s) - medicine , blood transfusion , population , hepatitis b virus , window period , hepatitis b , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , environmental health , immunology , blood supply , public health , virus , virology , intensive care medicine , surgery , antibody , serology , pathology
HIV was present in 1.1% of transfused blood during the early 1980s in some communities [1]. Perceived shortcomings in the response of the blood community, regulators, and public health authorities led to an exceptionally precautionary approach to transfusion-transmitted infections [2]. In return for unprecedented protection of transfusion recipients, blood donors have since been subjected to behavioral interrogation and testing, which uses 9 assays for 6 transfusion-transmissible infections, with great success. Behavioral deferrals (blood donor deferrals for high-risk behaviors) are surrogates, usually developed in the absence of acceptable laboratory tests, and they are blunt instruments. Still, for HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV), donor recruitment and interviewing reduce the prevalence of infection in donations from first time blood donors by ~80% [3], compared with the US population. Behavioral deferrals are retained after test deployment as a layer of

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom