z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Randomized Comparison of Amodiaquine plus Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine, Artemether-Lumefantrine, and Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Burkina Faso
Author(s) -
Issaka Zongo,
Grant Dorsey,
Noël Rouamba,
C. Dokomajilar,
Y. Séré,
Philip J. Rosenthal,
JeanBosco Ouédraogo
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1086/522985
Subject(s) - medicine , amodiaquine , artemether/lumefantrine , lumefantrine , sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine , piperaquine , artemether , regimen , malaria , sulfadoxine , population , plasmodium falciparum , artemisinin , pyrimethamine , immunology , environmental health
Combination antimalarial therapy is advocated to improve treatment efficacy and limit selection of drug-resistant parasites. We compared the efficacies of 3 combination regimens in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso: amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, which was recently shown to be highly efficacious at this site; artemether-lumefantrine, the new national first-line antimalarial regimen; and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP), a newer regimen.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom