Can One Afford Not to Screen for Parasites in High-Risk Immigrant Populations?
Author(s) -
Jay S. Keystone
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1086/522530
Subject(s) - strongyloidiasis , vietnamese , refugee , medicine , population , immigration , asymptomatic , immunology , malaria , demography , environmental health , helminths , pathology , geography , archaeology , linguistics , philosophy , sociology
The article by Posey et al. [1] in this issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases emphasizes once again the high prevalence of schistosomiais and strongyloidiasis among African refugees. Similar findings have been noted in previous studies of refugees and immigrants from areas where these 2 parasites are endemic. For example, a very high seroprevalence of strongyloidiasis has been noted among refugees from Southeast Asia. In a Canadian study of Southeast Asian refugees, Gyorkos et al. [2] noted that 131 (76.6%) of 171 Kampucheans, 15 (55.6%) of 27 Laotians, and 4 (11.8%) of 34 Vietnamese persons were seropositive. It was interesting to note the lack of association between abdominal pain and the presence of parasites in the studied population. However, this is not at all unexpected, given the fact that the vast majority of persons with parasitic infections remain asymptomatic unless the worm burden is high and/or the long-term damage from a chronic infection has led to pathological changes sufficient to cause illness.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom