z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Risk Factors for Nosocomial Candiduria Due toCandida glabrataandCandida albicans
Author(s) -
Anthony Harris,
Julio Castro,
Donald C. Sheppard,
Yehuda Carmeli,
Matthew H. Samore
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1086/520460
Subject(s) - candida glabrata , fluconazole , odds ratio , candida albicans , medicine , corpus albicans , microbiology and biotechnology , gastroenterology , biology , antifungal , dermatology
The aims of this study were to analyze the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with catheter-associated candiduria due to Candida glabrata and due to Candida albicans and to compare patients with candiduria due to C. glabrata or C. albicans (cases) with controls. Controls were a randomly chosen sample of inpatients with Foley catheters for whom urine cultures were negative for Candida species. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. There were 40 cases of C. glabrata candiduria and 289 cases of C. albicans candiduria. Factors strongly associated with both C. albicans candiduria and C. glabrata candiduria were female gender (P <. 05) and being in the intensive care unit (P <. 01). Fluconazole use (adjusted odds ratio, 4.37; P <. 01) and quinolone use (adjusted odds ratio, 3.16; P <. 01) were specifically associated with C. glabrata candiduria but not with C. albicans candiduria. In conclusion, patients receiving fluconazole treatment are at risk of developing C. glabrata candiduria.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom