English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Potential risk factors for the detection of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized patients were assessed by a case-control study. Forty patients whose first P. aeruginosa isolate was resistant or intermediate to imipenem were more likely than 387 controls to have received imipenem (odds ratio [OR] = 16.9; P &lt; .0001) and to have undergone organ transplantation (OR = 3.9; P = .008). No significant difference was found for treatments with other antibiotics, other underlying diseases, demographic characteristics, different exposures to the hospital environment, or the culture site. Imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were more likely to be resistant to other common antipseudomonal agents than were imipenem-susceptible isolates. It is concluded that treatment with imipenem, but not with other beta-lactam drugs, is a major risk factor for the detection of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa in hospitalized patients, that these organisms may relatively often be resistant to other antipseudomonal agents, and that the hospital environment per se might not play a major role in their epidemiology.

Imipenem‐ResistantPseudomonas aeruginosa: Risk Factors and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns