A Randomized, Double‐Blind Comparison of Itraconazole Oral Solution and Fluconazole Tablets in the Treatment of Esophageal Candidiasis
Author(s) -
C. Mel Wilcox,
Rabih O. Darouiche,
Loren Laine,
Bruce L. Moskovitz,
Irma Mallegol,
Jane Wu
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
the journal of infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.69
H-Index - 252
eISSN - 1537-6613
pISSN - 0022-1899
DOI - 10.1086/514028
Subject(s) - fluconazole , itraconazole , esophageal candidiasis , medicine , dermatology , mycosis , double blind , antifungal , surgery , pathology , immunology , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , alternative medicine , viral disease , placebo
This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole tablets in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. One hundred twenty-six immunocompromised patients with esophageal candidiasis were treated with itraconazole oral solution or fluconazole tablets (both at 100-200 mg) once daily for 3-8 weeks, for 2 weeks beyond the resolution of symptoms, and were then followed for 4 more weeks. Severity of symptoms was assessed weekly during treatment and every 2 weeks during follow-up. Patients treated with itraconazole oral solution had a rate of clinical response (cured or improved) comparable to that of patients treated with fluconazole (94% vs. 91%). The mycologic eradication rate was 92% for itraconazole and 78% for fluconazole. Both treatments were well tolerated. Results from treatment with once-daily itraconazole oral solution was clinically comparable to those with fluconazole and is an alternative for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom