How to Stop Harassment: Professional Construction of Legal Compliance in Organizations
Author(s) -
Frank Dobbin,
Erin L. Kelly
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
american journal of sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.755
H-Index - 181
eISSN - 1537-5390
pISSN - 0002-9602
DOI - 10.1086/508788
Subject(s) - grievance , harassment , jurisdiction , staffing , bureaucracy , compliance (psychology) , public relations , legislature , law , business , political science , psychology , social psychology , politics
Most employers installed sexual harassment grievance procedures and sensitivity training by the late 1990s. It was personnel experts, not courts, legislatures, or lawyers, who promoted these antihar- assment strategies, drawn from the profession's tool kit. Personnel succeeded because it was executives, not public officials, who defined professional jurisdiction, and executives proved susceptible to per- sonnel's argument that bureaucratic routines could reduce legal risk. With each landmark in harassment law, more employers adopted the grievance procedures personnel advocated despite negative re- views from lawyers. Employers who consulted personnel experts were more likely to join the bandwagon; those who consulted law- yers were less likely. The case holds lessons for the evolution of professions, because executives play an increasing role in defining professional jurisdiction.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom