z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Burdens of Proof in Civil Litigation: An Economic Perspective
Author(s) -
Bruce L. Hay,
Kathryn E. Spier
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
the journal of legal studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.251
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1537-5366
pISSN - 0047-2530
DOI - 10.1086/468002
Subject(s) - burden of proof , adversary , perspective (graphical) , proof of concept , point (geometry) , civil procedure , law and economics , civil litigation , economics , computer science , law , business , political science , computer security , mathematics , artificial intelligence , geometry , operating system
Burden of proof rules, which require a specified party to produce evidence on a contested issue, are central to the adversary system. In this article, we model burden of proof rules as a device for minimizing the costs of litigation. The central point to emerge from the model is that, properly assigned, a burden of proof rule economizes on the transmission of information to the court. We use the model to explain characteristic practices of courts in assigning the burden of proof.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom