Some Problems with Binary Features for Tone
Author(s) -
Herbert F. W. Stahlke
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
international journal of american linguistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.441
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 1545-7001
pISSN - 0020-7071
DOI - 10.1086/465450
Subject(s) - tone (literature) , complicity , representation (politics) , library science , art history , linguistics , art , philosophy , computer science , law , political science , politics
0. A fundamental assumption made in much modern linguistic research is that phonological contrasts are to be described by binary feature systems, an assumption which has encountered some of its greatest difficulties in the description of tonal systems. This article will be restricted to data from level-tone systems and will argue that the phonological representation of tone in binary features is inadequate for either synchronic or diachronic description. The discussion will begin with a review of the major feature frameworks for tone in use today, showing how each makes incorrect claims for some languages, while correctly accounting for phenomena in others. Then data from Igede and ProtoMixtecan will be discussed, showing binary features to b:e formally unworkable. Two criteria are necessary, though not sufficient, for any universal phonetic framework for describing the sounds of natural language. First, a phonetic theory of 1 An earlier version of this article was read at the Sixth Conference on African Linguistics, held at Columbus, Ohio in March 1975. I am grateful to John Goldsmith for his helpful comments.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom