z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy for Bacteremia: Get It Right from the Start or Get a Call from Infectious Disease
Author(s) -
Cunha Ba
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1086/424525
Subject(s) - medicine , bacteremia , antimicrobial , infectious disease (medical specialty) , intensive care medicine , disease , empiric therapy , antibiotics , microbiology and biotechnology , pathology , alternative medicine , biology
The difficulty in reporting microbiologic data has always been how to transfer this information to the treating physician in a timely fashion to optimize patient care. Exactly how to achieve this data transfer has always been problematic. The physician is not always informed of the preliminary microbiologic reports of blood culture data, particularly Gram stain results, even if reported to the ward or chart. Furthermore, the treating physician does not always interpret Gram stain information correctly or is often unable to relate Gram stain results to the clinical scenario [1-5]. The indication of "gram-positive cocci" in blood culture reports represents isolated information that, by itself, is unhelpful. If there are gram-positive cocci in blood cultures, the arrangement of the organisms must be stated (i.e., whether the grampositive cocci are arranged in pairs, chains, or clusters), which helps enormously. Additional helpful information includes the times between when blood culture samples were drawn and when blood culture results were determined to be positive. How many blood culture results are pos-

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom