z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Intranasal Influenza Vaccine in a Working Population
Author(s) -
Parham Sendi,
Rebecca Locher,
Bruno Bucheli,
Manuel Battegay
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1086/386330
Subject(s) - medicine , influenza vaccine , nasal administration , adverse effect , live attenuated influenza vaccine , incidence (geometry) , vaccination , population , immunology , environmental health , physics , optics
In the present study, we assessed the incidence of adverse events and influenza-like symptoms in a working population in Switzerland that was vaccinated against influenza. A total of 12,582 individuals of working age (<65 years old) were offered a free influenza vaccine of their choice (injectable or intranasal vaccine) in October and November 2000. Of these individuals, 1600 were vaccinated against influenza. Ninety-seven percent of the vaccine recipients chose the intranasal vaccine, and 3% chose the injectable influenza vaccine. The incidence of influenza-like symptoms and side effects was 13% and 36%, respectively. Individuals who chose the intranasal vaccine were more likely to report side effects (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.29-8.08). Facial paralysis was observed in 11 patients and was the most severe adverse event associated with the intranasal influenza vaccine. As a result of these adverse events, the intranasal vaccine was removed from the market in the fall of 2001.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom