The Logic of Sanctioning Welfare Recipients: An Empirical Assessment
Author(s) -
Yeheskel Hasenfeld,
Toorjo Ghose,
Kandyce Larson
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
social service review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.73
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1537-5404
pISSN - 0037-7961
DOI - 10.1086/382771
Subject(s) - sanctions , welfare , legislation , work (physics) , public economics , welfare reform , compliance (psychology) , empirical research , actuarial science , economics , business , political science , psychology , social psychology , law , engineering , philosophy , epistemology , mechanical engineering
The 1996 welfare reform legislation expanded the use of sanctions under the assumption that welfare recipients can comply with work requirements and that they can calculate the costs and benefits of compliance. This research tests the validity of these assumptions through a record‐ and survey‐based study of California welfare recipients. The article questions the validity of the assumptions, finding that, compared to nonsanctioned recipients, sanctioned recipients face greater barriers to meeting the work requirements. A significant proportion say that they were not informed about the sanctioning rules. Almost half of sanctioned recipients were not aware that they were sanctioned.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom