Does the Diagnosis of Trachoma Adequately Identify Ocular Chlamydial Infection in Trachoma‐Endemic Areas?
Author(s) -
Mariko Bird,
Chandler R. Dawson,
Julius Schachter,
Yinghui Miao,
Ahmed Shama,
Ahmed Osman,
Ahmad Bassem,
Thomas M. Lietman
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
the journal of infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.69
H-Index - 252
eISSN - 1537-6613
pISSN - 0022-1899
DOI - 10.1086/374743
Subject(s) - trachoma , azithromycin , medicine , chlamydia trachomatis , chlamydial infection , conjunctiva , chlamydia , ligase chain reaction , dermatology , immunology , polymerase chain reaction , antibiotics , pathology , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , multiplex polymerase chain reaction , biochemistry , gene
We evaluated the validity of clinically determined active trachoma as a surrogate for chlamydial eye infection in 1059 children from the Egyptian arm of the Azithromycin in the Control of Trachoma study. Participants were determined to be "clinically active" if they had >or=5 follicles or intense inflammatory infiltration on the tarsal conjunctiva. Conjunctival swabs were tested using ligase chain reaction (LCR) to detect chlamydial DNA. Of clinically active children aged 1-10 years, 31% did not have infection, as determined by LCR. Conversely, 31% of infected children were not clinically active; 78% of clinically active children aged 1-5 years were infected, versus 17% of those aged 11-15 years. The proportion of clinically active children who were infected decreased from 67% before treatment to 10% 14 months after mass azithromycin treatment. Clinically active trachoma is not always a reliable marker of infection, particularly in teenagers and after treatment.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom