Comparison of the Gamma‐Ray Burst Sensitivity of Different Detectors
Author(s) -
D. L. Band
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
the astrophysical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.376
H-Index - 489
eISSN - 1538-4357
pISSN - 0004-637X
DOI - 10.1086/374242
Subject(s) - physics , gamma ray burst , detector , sensitivity (control systems) , spectral sensitivity , astrophysics , energy (signal processing) , photon , low energy , flux (metallurgy) , gamma ray , swift , optics , atomic physics , chemistry , wavelength , quantum mechanics , electronic engineering , engineering , organic chemistry
Gamma-ray burst detectors are sensitive at different energies, complicatingthe comparison of the burst populations that they detect. The instrument teamsoften report their detector sensitivities in their instruments' energy band. Ipropose that sensitivities be reported as the threshold peak photon flux F_Tover the 1-1000 keV energy band for a specific spectral shape. The primaryspectral parameter is E_p, the energy of the maximum E^2 N_E propto nu f_nu.Thus F_T vs. E_p is a useful description of a detector's sensitivity. I findthat Swift will be marginally more sensitive than BATSE for E_p>100 keV, butsignificantly more sensitive for E_p<100 keV. Because of its low energysensitivity, the FREGATE on HETE-2 is surprisingly sensitive below E_p=100 keV.Both the WFC on BeppoSAX and the WXM on HETE-2 are/were sensitive for low E_p.As expected, the GBM on GLAST will be less sensitive than BATSE, while EXISTwill be significantly more sensitive than Swift. The BeppoSAX GRBM was lesssensitive that the WFC, particularly at low E_p.Comment: 25 pages, 10 figures. To appear in Ap.J, 588 (May 10, '03). Revisions correct FREGATE sensitivity and add a low energy GBM trigger ban
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom