z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Mean Number of Extra Microimage Pairs for Macrolensed Quasars
Author(s) -
Jonathan Granot,
Paul L. Schechter,
J. Wambsganß
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
the astrophysical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.376
H-Index - 489
eISSN - 1538-4357
pISSN - 0004-637X
DOI - 10.1086/345447
Subject(s) - gravitational microlensing , physics , magnification , quasar , galaxy , gravitational lens , astrophysics , caustic (mathematics) , poisson distribution , mass distribution , probability density function , stars , distribution (mathematics) , mathematics , optics , statistics , mathematical analysis , redshift , mathematical physics
When a gravitationally lensed source crosses a caustic, a pair of images iscreated or destroyed. We calculate the mean number of such pairs ofmicro-images $$ for a given macro-image of a gravitationally lensed pointsource, due to microlensing by the stars of the lensing galaxy. This quantitywas calculated by Wambsganss, Witt & Schneider (1992) for the case of zeroexternal shear, $\gamma=0$, at the location of the macro-image. Since inrealistic lens models a non-zero shear is expected to be induced by the lensinggalaxy, we extend this calculation to a general value of $\gamma$. We find acomplex behavior of $$ as a function of $\gamma$ and the normalized surfacemass density in stars $\kappa_*$. Specifically, we find that at highmagnifications, where the average total magnification of the macro-image is$<\mu>=|(1-\kappa_*)^2-\gamma^2|^{-1}\gg 1$, $$ becomes correspondinglylarge, and is proportional to $<\mu>$. The ratio $/<\mu>$ is largest nearthe line $\gamma=1-\kappa_*$ where the magnification $<\mu>$ becomes infinite,and its maximal value is 0.306. We compare our semi-analytic results for $$to the results of numerical simulations and find good agreement. We find thatthe probability distribution for the number of extra image pairs is reasonablydescribed by a Poisson distribution with a mean value of $$, and that thewidth of the macro-image magnification distribution tends to be largest for$\sim 1$.Comment: As accepted for publication in ApJ. 11 pages, 4 figures, minor change

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom