English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In a recently completed study of once-a-day ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam every 6 h in the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections, 540 patients were randomized in a 1rcolon;1 ratio and assigned to 1 of 2 strata: those with a complicating underlying disease or all others. The most common infections in the study were deep soft-tissue abscess (18.9%), followed by diabetic lower extremity infection (18.1%); 7.0% of these were perineal cellulitis/abscess. With the exception of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, almost all of the predominant aerobic pathogens were susceptible to both study drugs. Eighty-seven patients (16%) had &gt;/=1 anaerobe identified in their baseline wound cultures, with a total of 232 anaerobic isolates. Of the 141 anaerobes tested for susceptibility, 97.2% were susceptible to ertapenem and 97.9% to piperacillin-tazobactam. Ertapenem had excellent in vitro activity against the most common aerobic pathogens and almost all anaerobes recovered from patients with infections of the skin and skin structures.

clinical infectious diseases/clinical infectious diseases (online. university of chicago. press)

General Microbiology and In Vitro Susceptibility of Anaerobes Isolated from Complicated Skin and Skin‐Structure Infections in Patients Enrolled in a Comparative Trial of Ertapenem Versus Piperacillin‐Tazobactam