LOTIS, Super-LOTIS, Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and Tautenburg Observations of GRB 010921
Author(s) -
H.S. Park,
G. G. Williams,
D. H. Hartmann,
D. Q. Lamb,
Brian Lee,
D. L. Tucker,
S. Klose,
B. Stecklum,
A. A. Henden,
Jennifer Adelman,
S. D. Barthelmy,
John W. Briggs,
J. Brinkmann,
B. Chen,
T. L. Cline,
István Csabai,
N. Gehrels,
Michael Harvanek,
G. S. Hennessy,
K. Hurley,
Željko Ivezić,
S. Kent,
S. J. Kleinman,
J. Krzesiński,
K. Lindsay,
Daniel C. Long,
Robert J. Nemiroff,
Eric H. Neilsen,
A. Nitta,
Heidi Jo Newberg,
Peter R. Newman,
D. Pérez,
W. Periera,
Donald P. Schneider,
S. Snedden,
Chris Stoughton,
D. E. vanden Berk,
Donald G. York,
Klaus-Peter Ziock
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the astrophysical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.376
H-Index - 489
eISSN - 1538-4357
pISSN - 0004-637X
DOI - 10.1086/341334
Subject(s) - gamma ray burst , afterglow , physics , telescope , sky , astrophysics , observatory , schmidt camera , astronomy , galaxy , interplanetary spaceflight , optical telescope , magnetic field , quantum mechanics , solar wind
We present multi-instrument optical observations of the High Energy TransientExplorer (HETE-2)/Interplanetary Network (IPN) error box of GRB 010921. Thisevent was the first gamma ray burst (GRB) localized by HETE-2 which hasresulted in the detection of an optical afterglow. In this paper we report theearliest known observations of the GRB010921 field, taken with the 0.11-mLivermore Optical Transient Imaging System (LOTIS) telescope, and the earliestknown detection of the GRB010921 optical afterglow, using the 0.5-m SloanDigital Sky Survey Photometric Telescope (SDSS PT). Observations with the LOTIStelescope began during a routine sky patrol 52 minutes after the burst.Observations were made with the SDSS PT, the 0.6-m Super-LOTIS telescope, andthe 1.34-m Tautenburg Schmidt telescope at 21.3, 21.8, and 37.5 hours after theGRB, respectively. In addition, the host galaxy was observed with the USNOFS1.0-m telescope 56 days after the burst. We find that at later times (t > 1 dayafter the burst), the optical afterglow exhibited a power-law decline with aslope of $\alpha = 1.75 \pm 0.28$. However, our earliest observations show thatthis power-law decline can not have extended to early times (t < 0.035 day).Comment: AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e, 6 pages with 2 postscript figures, will be submitted to ApJ Letter
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom