Do Cooling Flows Survive Cluster Mergers?
Author(s) -
Percy Gómez,
C. Loken,
K. Roettiger,
Jack O. Burns
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the astrophysical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.376
H-Index - 489
eISSN - 1538-4357
pISSN - 0004-637X
DOI - 10.1086/339280
Subject(s) - physics , cooling flow , astrophysics , cluster (spacecraft) , turbulence , radius , accretion (finance) , galaxy cluster , flow (mathematics) , mechanics , galaxy , computer security , computer science , programming language
We report the results of recent numerical simulations of the head-on merger of a cooling flow cluster with an infalling subcluster of galaxies. The objective of these sim- ulations was to examine the effects of different types of cluster mergers (with 16:1 and 4:1 mass ratios) on the evolution of cluster cooling flows (with mass accretion rates of 100 and 400 M⊙/year). The 2-dimensional simulations were performed with a com- bined Hydrodynamics/N-body code on a uniform grid with a resolution of 20 kpc ( 12 zones/core radius). In our simulations, cooling flow disruption is indicated by a dramatic increase (by a factor of 10-40) in the central cooling time of the primary cluster. We find that the ram-pressure of the infalling gas is crucial in determining the fate of the cooling flow as disruption occurs when a substantial amount of subcluster gas reaches the primary's core. In such cases, the subcluster gas can increase the central cooling time by displacing the high-density cooling gas and by heating it via shocks and turbulent gas motions. However, the fate of a merging cooling flow is also dependent on its initial cooling time. In cases where the initial cooling time is very small (i.e., 10-40 times smaller than the Hubble time) then, even if the flow is disrupted, the central cooling time will remain less than a Hubble time and the flow will likely re-establish itself. This has an important observational consequence because such clusters will be classified as cooling flows on the basis of their cooling times even though they have experienced a significant merger. In addition, we find that there is a time delay between core-crossing and the point at which the central cooling time of a disrupted flow becomes of order a Hubble time. Thus, even in the case of disruption, a cluster can be classified as a cooling flow and exhibit substructure (indicative of a merger) for 1-2 Gyr after merging with a subcluster. We argue that our results make it possible to reconcile the high cooling flow frequency
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom