Population‐Based Strategies for Outreach Screening of UrogenitalChlamydia trachomatisInfections: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Author(s) -
Berit Andersen,
Frede Olesen,
Niels FrimodtMøller,
Lars Østergaard
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the journal of infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.69
H-Index - 252
eISSN - 1537-6613
pISSN - 0022-1899
DOI - 10.1086/338268
Subject(s) - outreach , medicine , chlamydia trachomatis , confidence interval , population , chlamydia , randomized controlled trial , sampling (signal processing) , gynecology , family medicine , immunology , environmental health , filter (signal processing) , computer vision , political science , computer science , law
The effect of 2 population-based outreach screening strategies that used in-home sampling was compared with usual care practices for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. All 30,439 persons 21-23 years old in Aarhus County, Denmark, were divided randomly into 3 groups: group 1 (n=4500) had a home sampling kit mailed directly to their centrally registered home address; group 2 (n=4500) had a reply card mailed to their home address with which a home sampling kit could be ordered; and group 3 (n=21,439) had access to usual care. For women in groups 1 and 2, the relative risks of being tested were 4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-4.4) and 3.5 (95% CI, 3.2-3.9), respectively, compared with usual care. The corresponding figures for men were 19.1 (95% CI, 16.0-22.8) and 11.8 (95% CI, 9.8-14.2), respectively. Both screening strategies were highly effective, but men benefited the most from having the home sampling kit provided directly.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom