Detecting Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. Monte Carlo Comparison of Cluster Detection Algorithms
Author(s) -
Rita Seung Jung Kim,
Jeremy Kepner,
Marc Postman,
Michael A. Strauss,
Neta A. Bahcall,
James E. Gunn,
Robert H. Lupton,
James Annis,
R. C. Nichol,
F. J. Castander,
J. Brinkmann,
Róbert Brunner,
Andrew J. Connolly,
István Csabai,
Robert B. Hindsley,
Željko Ivezić,
Michael S. Vogeley,
Donald G. York
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the astronomical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.61
H-Index - 271
eISSN - 1538-3881
pISSN - 0004-6256
DOI - 10.1086/324727
Subject(s) - redshift , sky , monte carlo method , astrophysics , algorithm , cluster (spacecraft) , galaxy , galaxy cluster , luminosity function , physics , filter (signal processing) , matched filter , voronoi diagram , computer science , statistics , mathematics , computer vision , geometry , programming language
We present a comparison of three cluster finding algorithms from imaging datausing Monte Carlo simulations of clusters embedded in a 25 deg^2 region ofSloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) imaging data: the Matched Filter (MF; Postmanet al. 1996), the Adaptive Matched Filter (AMF; Kepner et al. 1999) and acolor-magnitude filtered Voronoi Tessellation Technique (VTT). Among the twomatched filters, we find that the MF is more efficient in detecting faintclusters, whereas the AMF evaluates the redshifts and richnesses moreaccurately, therefore suggesting a hybrid method (HMF) that combines the two.The HMF outperforms the VTT when using a background that is uniform, but it ismore sensitive to the presence of a non-uniform galaxy background than is theVTT; this is due to the assumption of a uniform background in the HMF model. Wethus find that for the detection thresholds we determine to be appropriate forthe SDSS data, the performance of both algorithms are similar; we present theselection function for each method evaluated with these thresholds as afunction of redshift and richness. For simulated clusters generated with aSchechter luminosity function (M_r^* = -21.5 and alpha = -1.1) both algorithmsare complete for Abell richness >= 1 clusters up to z ~ 0.4 for a samplemagnitude limited to r = 21. While the cluster parameter evaluation shows amild correlation with the local background density, the detection efficiency isnot significantly affected by the background fluctuations, unlike previousshallower surveys.Comment: 38 pages, 15 figures, Accepted for publication in A
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom