z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Epidemiologic Differences between United States– and Foreign‐Born Tuberculosis Patients in Houston, Texas
Author(s) -
Hana M. El Sahly,
Gerald J. Adams,
Hanna Soini,
Larry D. Teeter,
James M. Musser
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
the journal of infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.69
H-Index - 252
eISSN - 1537-6613
pISSN - 0022-1899
DOI - 10.1086/318079
Subject(s) - foreign born , tuberculosis , epidemiology , medicine , demography , ethnic group , pediatrics , population , environmental health , political science , pathology , sociology , law
The proportion of foreign-born tuberculosis patients in the United States is increasing. To analyze the epidemiology of tuberculosis in foreign-born people, culture-positive patients with tuberculosis in Houston, Texas, were interviewed from October 1995 through September 1998, and their isolates were molecularly characterized. Of the 1131 patients included in the study, 795 (70.3%) were US born and 336 (29.7%) were foreign born. The decrease in tuberculosis case rate among US-born people was 3.5 times that of foreign-born people. Significantly more US-born than foreign-born patients belonged to strain clusters (71.3% vs. 29.5%; P<.001). Risk factors associated with strain clustering were as follows: black ethnicity, low income, and homelessness in US-born patients and homelessness in foreign-born patients. Isolates from foreign-born patients were more likely to be resistant to >/=1 drug (15.4% vs. 8.4%; P=.001) and to be multidrug resistant (2.4% vs. 0.7%; P=.027) than isolates from US-born patients. These observations warrant increased emphasis on this distinct subpopulation of tuberculosis patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom