English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Methods for enhancing immune responses to influenza were explored in 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Intranasal (inl) immunization with monovalent, live attenuated, cold-adapted recombinant (CR) or inactivated influenza virus (MIV) vaccine and intramuscular (im) immunization with MIV were evaluated in various combinations. Healthy susceptible adults were assigned randomly to receive 10(7.1) TCID(50) of CR (A/H1N1 or A/H3N2), homologous MIV (15 microg), or placebo inl and placebo or homologous MIV im (6 groups in each study). Serum antibody responses were greatest in groups given im vaccine (with or without inl vaccine). A 2-fold increase in nasal wash antibody response frequencies was seen in groups given combined inl (CR or MIV) and im vaccine, compared with subjects given a single im (MIV) or inl (CR or MIV) vaccine. Combined inl and im immunization is a promising approach for enhancing both local and systemic immune responses against influenza.

the journal of infectious diseases (online. university of chicago press)/the journal of infectious diseases

Immunization against Influenza: Comparison of Various Topical and Parenteral Regimens Containing Inactivated and/or Live Attenuated Vaccines in Healthy Adults