Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles for Group B Streptococci Isolated from Neonates, 1995-1998
Author(s) -
Feng Lin,
Parvin H. Azimi,
Leonard E. Weisman,
Joseph B. Philips,
Joan A. Regan,
Penny Clark,
G G Rhoads,
John D. Clemens,
James Troendle,
E Pratt,
Ruth A. Brenner,
V J Gill
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1086/313936
Subject(s) - erythromycin , clindamycin , penicillin , cefotaxime , microbiology and biotechnology , antibiotics , medicine , streptococcus , chloramphenicol , vancomycin , drug resistance , streptococcaceae , biology , bacteria , staphylococcus aureus , genetics
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles were analyzed for 119 invasive and 227 colonizing strains of group B streptococci isolated from neonates at 6 US academic centers. All strains were susceptible to penicillin, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, and cefotaxime. The rate of resistance to erythromycin was 20.2% and to clindamycin was 6.9%. Resistance to erythromycin increased in 1997. Type V strains were more resistant to erythromycin than were type Ia (P=.003) and type Ib (P=.004) strains and were more resistant to clindamycin than were type Ia (P<.001), type Ib (P=.01), and type III (P=.001) strains. Resistance rates varied with geographic region: in California, there were high rates of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin (32% and 12%, respectively), and low rates in Florida (8.5% and 2.1%, respectively). Penicillin continues to be the drug of choice for treatment of group B streptococcus infection. For women who are penicillin intolerant, however, the selection of an alternative antibiotic should be guided by contemporary resistance patterns observed in that region.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom