Comparison of Analytical Mass Functions with Numerical Simulations
Author(s) -
Jounghun Lee,
S. F. Shandarin
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
the astrophysical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.376
H-Index - 489
eISSN - 1538-4357
pISSN - 0004-637X
DOI - 10.1086/312012
Subject(s) - function (biology) , realization (probability) , power law , power function , cold dark matter , computer simulation , redshift , physics , statistical physics , dark matter , mathematics , mathematical analysis , quantum mechanics , astrophysics , statistics , mechanics , galaxy , evolutionary biology , biology
We present numerical testing results of our mass function derived in ourprevious paper, and compare the testing results with those of the popularPress-Schechter (PS) mass function. Two fiducial models are considered for thetest: the scale-free power-law spectra P(k) \propto k^{n} with spectral indicesn=-1, 0 and the standard cold dark matter (SCDM) model with Omega =1 and h=0.5.For the power-law models, we use numerical data averaged over several differentoutput times: ten output times from two N-body realizations for the n=-1power-law model; four outputs from one realization for the n=0 model. While forthe SCDM model, we consider four outputs separately at redshifts z = 0, 0.43,1.14 and 1.86 from one large N-body simulations. The comparison results showthat our mass function fits the numerical data in a much improved way over thePS one. Thus, we expect that our mass function can be a viable alternative ofthe PS mass function in applications to various areas.Comment: Revised version. Accepted by ApJ Letter. Significantly improved. Numerical test for the SCDM model included. 14 pages, Latex file, 2 psfig
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom