z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Early X-Ray/Ultraviolet Line Signatures of Gamma-Ray Burst Progenitors and Hypernovae
Author(s) -
C. Weth,
P. Mészáros,
T. R. Kallman,
M. J. Rees
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
the astrophysical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.376
H-Index - 489
eISSN - 1538-4357
pISSN - 0004-637X
DOI - 10.1086/308792
Subject(s) - hypernova , physics , astrophysics , funnel , supernova , gamma ray burst , spectral line , line (geometry) , afterglow , emission spectrum , x ray , ultraviolet , pair instability supernova , astronomy , optics , chemistry , geometry , mathematics , organic chemistry , ejecta
We calculate the X-ray/UV spectral line signatures expected from theinteraction of a gamma-ray burst afterglow and a dense pre-burst environmentproduced by the progenitor. We explore the conditions under which Fe line andedge equivalent widths of $\sim$ 1 keV can arise, and discuss the possibilityof gaining information about possible progenitor scenarios using X-ray metalline spectra in the first few days of a burst. A wind or supernova shell aroundthe burst produces an X-ray absorption line spectrum and later emission lines,while a hypernova funnel model produces mainly emission lines. The Fe \ked canin some cases be more prominent than the Fe \kal line. Under simple assumptionsfor the input continuum luminosity, current reports of observed Fe lineluminosities are compatible with an Fe-enriched funnel model, while lowervalues are expected in shell models.Comment: revisions to ApJ ms first submitted 8/21/99; uses a higher and flatter input spectrum, with modified implications suggesting preference for funnel model

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom