z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Nonnucleosynthetic Constraints on the Baryon Density and Other Cosmological Parameters
Author(s) -
Gary Steigman,
Naoya Hata,
J. E. Felten
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
the astrophysical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.376
H-Index - 489
eISSN - 1538-4357
pISSN - 0004-637X
DOI - 10.1086/306589
Subject(s) - physics , baryon , cold dark matter , astrophysics , universe , cosmology , cosmological model
Because the baryon-to-photon ratio eta_{10} is in some doubt, we dropnucleosynthetic constraints on eta_{10} and fit the three cosmologicalparameters (h, Omega_M, eta_{10}) to four observational constraints: Hubbleparameter h_o = 0.70+-0.15, age of the universe t_o = 14+7-2 Gyr, cluster gasfraction f_o \equiv f_G h^{3/2} = 0.060 +- 0.006, and effective shape parameterGamma_o = 0.255 +- 0.017. Errors quoted are 1 sigma, and we assume Gaussianstatistics. We experiment with a fifth constraint Omega_o = 0.2 +- 0.1 fromclusters. We set the tilt parameter n = 1 and the gas enhancement factorUpsilon = 0.9. We consider CDM models (open and Omega_M = 1) and flat LambdaCDMmodels. We test goodness of fit and draw confidence regions by the Delta chi^2method. CDM models with Omega_M = 1 (SCDM models) are accepted only because thelarge error on h_o allows h < 0.5. Baryonic matter plays a significant role inGamma_o when Omega_M \sim 1. Open CDM models are accepted only for Omega_M\gtrsim 0.4. The combination of the four other constraints with Omega_o = 0.2+- 0.1 is rejected in CDM models with 98% confidence, suggesting that light maynot trace mass. LambdaCDM models give similar results. In all of these models,eta_{10} \gtrsim 6 is favored strongly over eta_{10} \lesssim 2. This suggeststhat reports of low deuterium abundances on QSO lines of sight may be correctand that observational determinations of primordial 4He may have systematicerrors. Plausible variations on n and Upsilon in our models do not change theresults much. If we drop or change the crucial Gamma_o constraint, lower valuesof Omega_M and eta_{10} are permitted. The constraint Gamma_o = 0.15 +- 0.04,derived recently from the IRAS redshift survey, favors Omega_M \approx 0.3 andeta_{10} \approx 5 but does not exclude eta_{10} \approx 2.Comment: Version accepted for ApJ. New section with figures showing effect of smaller Gamma; other minor changes. 18 pages including 14 ps figures; uses AAS LaTeX v4.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom