Statistical Tests for CHDM and ΛCDM Cosmologies
Author(s) -
Sebastiano Ghigna,
S. Borgani,
Marco Tucci,
S. A. Bonometto,
Anatoly Klypin,
Joel R. Primack
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
the astrophysical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.376
H-Index - 489
eISSN - 1538-4357
pISSN - 0004-637X
DOI - 10.1086/303912
Subject(s) - physics , cold dark matter , estimator , redshift , kurtosis , dark matter , scaling , skewness , redshift survey , astrophysics , galaxy , statistical physics , correlation function (quantum field theory) , statistics , mathematics , geometry , optoelectronics , dielectric
We apply several statistical estimators to high-resolution N-body simulationsof two currently viable cosmological models: a mixed dark matter model, having$\Omega_\nu=0.2$ contributed by two massive neutrinos (C+2\nuDM), and a ColdDark Matter model with Cosmological Constant (\LambdaCDM) with $\Omega_0=0.3$and h=0.7. Our aim is to compare simulated galaxy samples with thePerseus-Pisces redshift survey (PPS). We consider the n-point correlationfunctions (n=2-4), the N-count probability functions P_N, including the voidprobability function P_0, and the underdensity probability function U_\epsilon(where \epsilon fixes the underdensity threshold in percentage of the average).We find that P_0 (for which PPS and CfA2 data agree) and P_1 distinguishefficiently between the models, while U_\epsilon is only marginallydiscriminatory. On the contrary, the reduced skewness and kurtosis are,respectively, S_3\simeq 2.2 and S_4\simeq 6-7 in all cases, quite independentof the scale, in agreement with hierarchical scaling predictions and estimatesbased on redshift surveys. Among our results, we emphasize the remarkableagreement between PPS data and C+2\nuDM in all the tests performed. Incontrast, the above \LambdaCDM model has serious difficulties in reproducingobservational data if galaxies and matter overdensities are related in a simpleway.Comment: 12 pages, 10 figures, LaTeX (aaspp4 macro), in press on ApJ, Vol. 479, April 199
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom