z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Models for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with 2-Tuple Linguistic Assessment Information
Author(s) -
Guiwu Wei,
Rui Lin,
Xiaofei Zhao,
Hongjun Wang
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
international journal of computational intelligence systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.385
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1875-6891
pISSN - 1875-6883
DOI - 10.1080/18756891.2010.9727702
Subject(s) - topsis , tuple , group decision making , closeness , rule based machine translation , ideal (ethics) , computer science , rank (graph theory) , mathematics , weight , ideal solution , group (periodic table) , linguistics , data mining , artificial intelligence , operations research , discrete mathematics , pure mathematics , combinatorics , philosophy , chemistry , organic chemistry , mathematical analysis , physics , epistemology , lie algebra , political science , law , thermodynamics
The aim of this paper is to investigate the multiple attribute group decision making(MAGDM) problems with 2tuple linguistic assessment information, in which the information about attribute weights is incompletely known, and the attribute values take the form of linguistic assessment information. In order to get the weight vector of the attribute, we establish two optimization models based on the basic ideal of traditional TOPSIS, by which the attribute weights can be determined. For the special situations where the information about attribute weights is completely unknown, we establish some other optimization models. By solving these models, we get two simple and exact formulas, which can be used to determine the attribute weights. Then, based on the TOPSIS method, calculation steps for solving MAGDM problems with 2-tuple linguistic assessment information are given. The weighted distances between every alternative and 2-tuple linguistic positive ideal solution (TLPIS) and 2-tuple linguistic negative ideal solution (TLNIS) are calculated. Then, according to the weighted distances, the relative closeness degree to the TLPIS is calculated to rank all alternatives. These methods have exact characteristic in linguistic information processing. They avoided information distortion and losing which occur formerly in the linguistic information processing. Finally, some practical examples are used to illustrate the developed procedures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom