z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Language and conceptual reanalysis
Author(s) -
Paul M. Pietroski
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
linguistik aktuell
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Book series
ISSN - 0166-0829
DOI - 10.1075/la.194.04pie
Subject(s) - linguistics , computer science , natural language processing , history , philosophy
In my view, phrasal meanings are instructions for how to build conjunctive monadic concepts. But phrasal concepts like ‘chase cows’ are not merely conjunctive. The idea is that open class lexical items fetch monadic concepts like CHASE (_), while some grammatical relations introduce thematic concepts like PATIENT (_, _) and a restricted form of existential closure. I grant that animal cognition employs singular and polyadic concepts. But I think lexicalization is often a formally creative process in which nonmonadic concepts are used to introduce concepts like CHASE (_). In defending this view, I draw on Frege’s conception of logic and Chomsky’s conception of linguistics. My aim, in the spirit of Chomsky’s minimalist program, is to reduce the stock of composition operations that semanticists appeal to. Much of the paper focuses on the requisite conjunction and closure operations, distinguishing them from more general operations that theorists often invoke.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom