English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This experimental study examined whether non-renditions are linked to the court interpreter’s perceived impartiality. A witnessexamination was simulated in three variations on a scripted role play, with consecutive interpreting between Cantonese andEnglish. A sample of female Cantonese speakers, divided into two experimental groups and a control group, each played the part ofthe witness in one role play; the interpreter and the English-speaking bench (judge and defense attorney) were always played bythe same three actors. In two experimental groups, the interpretation included some utterances with no source speech counterpart(non-renditions): a Cantonese non-rendition group (16 individuals) had procedural and textual non-renditions addressed to them inCantonese, without English interpretation for the bench; an English non-rendition group (15 individuals) heard some briefexchanges between the interpreter and the bench, with no Cantonese interpretation. A control group (15 individuals) was notexposed to non-renditions. All three groups completed a questionnaire after the role play. The English non-rendition group ratedthe interpreter significantly lower than the others on impartiality, and was also the only group to comment unfavorably on theinterpreter. A possible explanation is that the Cantonese speakers in this group could not follow the English non-renditions andfelt excluded.

Non-renditions and the court interpreter’s perceived impartiality