z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Norms of assertion in the United States, Germany, and Japan
Author(s) -
Markus Kneer
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.2105365118
Subject(s) - assertion , misinformation , order (exchange) , focus (optics) , political science , law and economics , law , sociology , epistemology , philosophy , economics , computer science , physics , optics , finance , programming language
The recent controversy about misinformation has moved a question into the focus of the public eye that has occupied philosophers for decades: Under what conditions is it appropriate to assert a certain claim? When asserting a claim that x , must one know that x ? Must x be true? Might it be normatively acceptable to assert whatever one believes? In the largest cross-cultural study to date (total n = 1,091) on the topic, findings from the United States, Germany, and Japan suggest that, in order to claim that x , x need not be known, and it can be false. However, the data show, we do expect considerable epistemic responsibility on the speaker's behalf: In order to appropriately assert a claim, the speaker must have good reasons to believe it.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here