English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Jung et al. (1) make the bold claim that a storm’s assigned gender (traditionally masculine vs. feminine name) predicts its destructive potential, such that a hypothetical Hurricane Eloise would have three times the expected death toll compared with a hypothetical Hurricane Charley, by 41 deaths to 15 deaths. They say that feminine names and pronouns are perceived by the public to be less threatening, resulting in lax preparations and fewer evacuations. Their conclusion was widely reported in the popular press. During 30+ years on the Gulf Coast, my hurricane evacuations show no gender bias (Andrew, Lili, Rita, and Gustav). I am skeptical that sexism …

Statistics show no evidence of gender bias in the public's hurricane preparedness