z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Electron delocalization in the S 1 and T 1 metal-to-ligand charge transfer states of trans -substituted metal quadruply bonded complexes
Author(s) -
Brian G. Alberding,
Malcolm H. Chisholm,
Judith C. Gallucci,
Yagnaseni Ghosh,
Terry L. Gustafson
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.1103082108
Subject(s) - delocalized electron , singlet state , chemistry , ligand (biochemistry) , metal , crystallography , charge (physics) , spectroscopy , photochemistry , atomic physics , excited state , physics , biochemistry , receptor , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
The singletS 1 and tripletT 1 photoexcited states of the compounds containing MM quadruple bondstrans -M2 (Ti PB)2 (O2 CC6 H4 -4-CN)2 , where Ti PB = 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzoate and M = Mo (I ) or M = W (I ′ ), andtrans -M2 (O2 CMe)2 ((N[i  Pr ])2 CC ≡ CC6 H5 )2 , where M = Mo (II ) and M = W (II ′ ), have been investigated by a variety of spectroscopic techniques including femtosecond time-resolved infrared spectroscopy. The singlet states are shown to be delocalized metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) states forI andI ′ but localized forII andII ′ involving the cyanobenzoate or amidinate ligands, respectively. The triplet states are MoMoδδ * for bothI andII but delocalized3 MLCT forI ′ and localized3 MLCT forII ′ . These differences arise from consideration of the relative orbital energies of the M2 δ or M2 δ * and the ligandπ ∗ as well as the magnitudes of orbital overlap.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here